Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being ; 14(1): 158-175, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396709

RESUMEN

A recent childhood vaccine promotion intervention trial showed no effects on vaccination outcomes relative to usual care. The purpose of this paper was to test assumptions and theory-based relationships underlying hypothesised mechanisms for two vaccine promotion educational websites (one tailored to parental values, beliefs, and intentions; one untailored) compared with usual care. This is a secondary analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Parental vaccine values, hesitancy, attitudes, and intention to vaccinate surveys were administered at baseline (≤2 months) and at 4-6 and 10-12 months of age. Vaccination was assessed using electronic health records. Analyses included random coefficient models and risk differences with exact confidence limits. Parental vaccine values were mostly stable over time. Vaccine attitudes were generally positive, with no differences among study arms. Both tailored and untailored website arms showed similar increases in intention to vaccinate more than usual care. Positive changes in intentions were associated with lower rates of late vaccination. Although attitudes and intentions predicted vaccination behavior and the intervention increased intention to vaccinate all on time, the web-based education and values-tailored messaging approaches were not effective at increasing vaccination rates. Intentions are necessary but insufficient targets for vaccine promotion interventions.


Asunto(s)
Intervención basada en la Internet , Vacunas , Niño , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Intención , Padres , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacunación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687307

RESUMEN

Background: Take home naloxone (THN) programs have been shown to effectively reverse opioid overdose events with limited adverse events, yet often miss young adults who use opioids. To identify opportunities for naloxone expansion, we conducted interviews with young adults who had used opioids. We explored young adults' experience with current THN programs, and perspectives on ideal THN programs and emerging naloxone public health vending machine (PHVM) programs shown to increase access to sterile syringes in young adults. Methods: We interviewed 16 young adults receiving substance treatment services within an integrated safety net healthcare system. Participants were 18-30 years of age with a history of nonmedical prescription opioid use. Interviews obtained the patient perspective of current THN, ideal THN and PHVM programs. Interviews were transcribed and coded by team-based methods. Themes were developed using an inductive-deductive iterative approach and defined through consensus. Results: Treatment was often the first exposure to naloxone. Participants recommended easy to access programs for ideal naloxone distribution and had overall positive feedback on PHVMs. Three key themes were identified to improve naloxone uptake: knowledge, convenience, and privacy. Participants identified safety, lack of police presence, and low costs as important vending machine features. Conclusions: Our results identified implementation opportunities to increase naloxone uptake including convenient location and hours, privacy, and using trusted sources of information to improve program awareness. PHVMs present an opportunity to maximize these opportunities and increase access to naloxone in young adults.

3.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 227: 108980, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Youth are vulnerable to opioid use initiation and its complications. With growing rates of opioid overdose, strategies to identify youth at risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) to efficiently focus prevention interventions are needed. This study developed and validated a prediction model of OUD in youth aged 14-18 years. METHODS: The model was developed in a Colorado healthcare system (derivation site) using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Model predictors and outcomes were identified using electronic health record data. The model was externally validated in a separate Denver safety net health system (validation site). Youth were followed for up to 3.5 years. We evaluated internal and external validity using discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 76,603 youth, of whom 108 developed an OUD diagnosis. The model contained 3 predictors (smoking status, mental health diagnosis, and non-opioid substance use or disorder) and demonstrated good calibration (p = 0.90) and discrimination (bootstrap-corrected C-statistic = 0.76: 95 % CI = 0.70, 0.82). Sensitivity and specificity were 57 % and 84 % respectively with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.49 %. The validation cohort included 45,790 youth of whom, 74 developed an OUD diagnoses. The model demonstrated poorer calibration (p < 0.001) but good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.89; 95 % CI = 0.84, 0.95), sensitivity of 87.8 % specificity of 68.6 %, and PPV of 0.45 %. CONCLUSIONS: In two Colorado healthcare systems, the prediction model identified 57-88 % of subsequent OUD diagnoses in youth. However, PPV < 1% suggests universal prevention strategies for opioid use in youth may be the best health system approach.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adolescente , Calibración , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Vaccine ; 39(29): 3983-3990, 2021 06 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34059372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the rates of vaccination decline in children with logistical barriers to vaccination, new strategies to increase vaccination are needed. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the Vaccines For Babies (VFB) intervention, an automated reminder system with online resources to address logistical barriers to vaccination in caregivers of children enrolled in an integrated healthcare system. Effectiveness was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with parents of children less than two years old to identify logistical barriers to vaccination that were used to develop the VFB intervention. VFB included automated reminders to schedule the 6- and 12-month vaccine visit linking caregivers to resources to address logistic barriers, sent to the preferred mode of outreach (text, email, and/or phone). Parents of children between 3 and 10 months of age with indicators of logistical barriers to vaccination were randomized to receive VFB or usual well child care (UC). The primary outcome was percentage of days undervaccinated at 2 years of life. A difference in differences analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with 6 parents of children less than 2 years of age identified transportation, scheduling challenges, and knowledge of vaccine timing as logistical barriers to vaccination. We enrolled 250 participants in the trial, 45% were loss to follow-up. There were no significant differences in vaccination uptake between those enrolled in UC or the VFB intervention (0.51%, p = 0.86). In Medicaid enrolled participants, there was a modest decrease in percentage of days undervaccinated in the VFB intervention compared to UC (6.3%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Automated Reminders and with links to heath system resources was not shown to increase infant vaccination uptake demonstrating additional resources are needed to address the needs of caregivers experiencing logistical barriers to vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Recordatorios , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Humanos , Lactante , Motivación , Padres , Vacunación
5.
Transl Behav Med ; 11(3): 863-869, 2021 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449120

RESUMEN

Use of digital communication technologies (DCT) shows promise for enhancing outcomes and efficiencies in asthma care management. However, little is known about the impact of DCT interventions on healthcare personnel requirements and costs, thus making it difficult for providers and health systems to understand the value of these interventions. This study evaluated the differences in healthcare personnel requirements and costs between usual asthma care (UC) and a DCT intervention (Breathewell) aimed at maintaining guidelines-based asthma care while reducing health care staffing requirements. We used data from a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial conducted in a large integrated health system involving 14,978 patients diagnosed with asthma. To evaluate differences in staffing requirements and cost between Breathewell and UC needed to deliver guideline-based care we used electronic health record (EHR) events, provider time tracking surveys, and invoicing. Differences in cost were reported at the patient and health system level. The Breathewell intervention significantly reduced personnel requirements with a larger percentage of participants requiring no personnel time (45% vs. 5%, p < .001) and smaller percentage of participants requiring follow-up outreach (44% vs. 68%, p < .001). Extrapolated to the total health system, cost for the Breathewell intervention was $16,278 less than usual care. The intervention became cost savings at a sample size of at least 957 patients diagnosed with asthma. At the population level, using DCT to compliment current asthma care practice presents an opportunity to reduce healthcare personnel requirements while maintaining population-based asthma control measures.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Teléfono Celular , Comunicación , Correo Electrónico , Personal de Salud/economía , Administración de Personal/economía , Administración de Personal/métodos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Pediatrics ; 146(5)2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To increase vaccine acceptance, we created a Web-based the "Vaccines and Your Baby" intervention (VAYB) that provided new parents with vaccine information messages tailored to vaccine beliefs and values. We evaluated the effectiveness of the VAYB by comparing timely uptake of infant vaccines to an untailored version of the intervention (UT) or usual care intervention (UC) only. METHODS: Between April 2016 and June 2019, we conducted a randomized clinical trial. Pregnant women and new parents were randomly assigned to the VAYB, UT, or UC arms. In the VAYB and UT arms, participants were exposed to interventions at 4 time points from pregnancy until their child was 15 months of age. The primary outcome was up-to-date status for recommended vaccines from birth to 200 days of age. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was conducted. Data were analyzed with logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We enrolled 824 participants (276 VAYB, 274 UT, 274 UC), 143 (17.4%) of whom were lost to follow-up. The up-to-date rates in the VAYB, UT, and UC arms were 91.44%, 92.86%, and 92.31%, respectively. Infants in the VAYB arm were not more likely to be up to date than infants in the UC arm (OR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.45-1.76) or in the UT arm (OR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.42-1.63). The odds of being up to date did not differ between UT and UC arms (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Delivering Web-based vaccine messages tailored to parents' vaccine attitudes and values did not positively impact the timely uptake of infant vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor , Internet , Padres , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacunación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos
7.
Front Public Health ; 8: 59, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195217

RESUMEN

Background: RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) dissemination and implementation frameworks define theory-based domains associated with the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based interventions. Used together, the two frameworks identify metrics for evaluating implementation success, i.e., high reach and effectiveness resulting in sustained practice change (RE-AIM), and modifiable factors that explain and enhance implementation outcomes (CFIR). We applied both frameworks to study the implementation planning process for a technology-delivered asthma care intervention called Breathewell within an integrated care organization. The goal of the Breathewell intervention is to increase the efficiency of delivering resource-intensive asthma care services. Methods: We reviewed historical documents (i.e., meeting agendas; minutes) from 14 months of planning to evaluate alignment of implementation team priorities with RE-AIM domains. Key content was extracted and analyzed on topics, frequency and amount of discussion within each RE-AIM domain. Implementation team members were interviewed using questions adapted from the CFIR Interview Guide Tool to focus their reflection on the process and contextual factors considered during pre-implementation planning. Documents and transcripts were initially coded using RE-AIM domain definitions, and recoded using CFIR constructs, with intent to help explain how team decisions and actions can contribute to adoption, implementation and maintenance outcomes. Results: Qualitative analysis of team documents and interviews demonstrated strong alignment with the RE-AIM domains: Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation; and with the CFIR constructs: formal inclusion of provider and staff stakeholders in implementation planning, compatibility of the intervention with workflows and systems, and alignment of the intervention with organizational culture. Focus on these factors likely contributed to RE-AIM outcomes of high implementation fidelity. However, team members expressed low confidence that Breathewell would be adopted and maintained post-trial. A potential explanation was weak alignment with several CFIR constructs, including tension for change, relative priority, and leadership engagement that contribute to organizational receptivity and motivation to sustain change. Conclusions: While RE-AIM provides a practical framework for planning and evaluating practice change interventions to assure their external validity, CFIR explains why implementation succeeded or failed, and when used proactively, identifies relevant modifiable factors that can promote or undermine adoption, implementation, and maintenance.


Asunto(s)
Motivación , Cultura Organizacional , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
8.
Med Care ; 58(4): 352-359, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Challenges to health care efficiency are increasingly addressed with the help of digital communication technology tools (DCTs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether DCT, compared with Usual Care, can reduce health care clinician burden without increasing asthma-related exacerbations among patients with asthma in a large integrated health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN: The (Breathewell) program was a pragmatic, randomized trial at (Kaiser Permanente Colorado), where asthma nurses screen patients for poor symptom control when beta2-agonist refill requests came within 60 days of previous fill or in the absence of a controller medication fill within 4 months (beta2-agonist overfill). A total of 14,978 adults with asthma were randomized to Usual Care or 1 of 2 DCT intervention groups (Text/Phone call or Email). SUBJECTS: Participants included adults 18 and older with an asthma diagnosis at the time of randomization and no history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included asthma-related health care resource utilization (eg, asthma nurse contacts), medication use, and exacerbations. RESULTS: A total of 1933 patients had 4337 events which met beta2-agonist overfill criteria. Of the 2874 events in the intervention arm, 1188 (41%) were resolved by DCT contact and did not require additional clinician contact. Asthma medication use and exacerbations over 12 months did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCT tools can successfully contact adult asthma patients to screen for symptoms and facilitate intervention. The absence of differences in medication fills and health care utilization indicates that the strategic replacement of nursing interventions by digital outreach did not reduce treatment adherence or compromise health care outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Correo Electrónico , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Carga de Trabajo , Colorado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(3): e15800, 2020 03 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy among parents leads to childhood undervaccination and outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease. As the reasons for vaccine hesitancy are diverse, there is often not enough time during regular clinical visits for medical providers to adequately address all the concerns that parents have. Providing individually tailored vaccine information via the internet before a clinical visit may be a good mechanism for effectively allaying parents' vaccination concerns while also being time efficient. Including tailoring based on values is a promising, but untested, approach to message creation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the process by which we developed a Web-based intervention that is being used in an ongoing randomized controlled trial aimed at improving the timeliness of infant vaccination by reducing parental vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: Development of the intervention incorporated evidence-based health behavior theories. A series of interviews, surveys, and feedback sessions were used to iteratively develop the intervention in collaboration with vaccination experts and potential end users. RESULTS: In all, 41 specific content areas were identified to be included in the intervention. User feedback elucidated preferences for specific design elements to be incorporated throughout the website. The tile-based architecture chosen for the website was perceived as easy to use. Creating messages that were two-sided was generally preferred over other message formats. Quantitative surveys identified associations between specific vaccine values and vaccination beliefs, suggesting that values tailoring should vary, depending on the specific belief being endorsed. CONCLUSIONS: Using health behavior theories, qualitative and quantitative data, and significant expert and end user input, we created a novel, Web-based intervention to improve infant vaccination timeliness. The intervention is based on tailoring messages according to each individual's values and beliefs. This intervention is currently being tested in a controlled randomized clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Intervención basada en la Internet/tendencias , Madres/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Perm J ; 24: 1-8, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482949

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Refill reminders can help patients improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences for reminder type or whether patients who express a preference differ from patients who do not. OBJECTIVES: To describe patient preferences for ICS prescription refill reminder type and to compare baseline ICS therapy adherence, measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) 1 year before initiating preference-based reminders, between patients who did and did not express a preference. DESIGN: This substudy within a randomized multi-intervention study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado. Adults with asthma randomized to intervention were offered the opportunity to choose text, telephone, or email reminders. Patients who did and did not provide a preference were compared by baseline characteristics using log-binomial models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were reminder preference and type. RESULTS: A total of 1497 of 4545 patients (32.9%) expressed a preference; 789 (52.7%) chose text. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of not providing a preference increased with decreasing PDC (PDC of 0.50 to < 0.80: aRR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.25; PDC < 0.5: aRR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.59-1.95) compared with patients with a PDC of 0.80 or greater. CONCLUSION: Among patients who expressed a preference, text reminders were preferred. Patients who expressed a preference had higher baseline adherence. Further research is needed to determine whether expressing a preference for a refill reminder type is itself associated with adherence. Given that offering the opportunity to choose a reminder type only engaged a subset of patients, further work is needed to understand how best to leverage technology-enabled communication outreach to help patients optimize adherence.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Teléfono
11.
Am J Prev Med ; 57(4): e125-e133, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471001

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccines are recommended for pregnant women in each pregnancy, yet uptake is suboptimal. This study tested the efficacy of an online vaccine resource in increasing uptake of Tdap and influenza vaccines among pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted among women in the third trimester of pregnancy in an integrated healthcare system in Colorado in September 2013-July 2016, with data analysis in 2017-2018. INTERVENTION: Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 arms: website with vaccine information and interactive social media components, website with vaccine information only, or usual care. Participants in the website with vaccine information and interactive social media components and website with vaccine information only arms had access to the same base vaccine content. The website with vaccine information and interactive social media components also included a blog, discussion forum, and "Ask a Question" portal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tdap and influenza vaccination. These outcomes were analyzed separately. RESULTS: For influenza (n=289), women in both the website with vaccine information and interactive social media components (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.06, 4.53) and website with vaccine information only (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.03, 4.69) arms had higher vaccine uptake than the usual care arm. The proportions of women receiving the influenza vaccine were 57%, 55%, and 36% in the website with vaccine information and interactive social media components, website with vaccine information only, and usual care arms, respectively. For Tdap (n=173), there were no significant differences in vaccine uptake between study arms. The proportions of women receiving Tdap were 71%, 69%, and 68% in the website with vaccine information and interactive social media components, website with vaccine information only, and usual care arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based vaccination information sent to pregnant women can positively influence maternal influenza vaccine uptake. Because of potential scalability, the impact of robust vaccination information websites should be studied in other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01873040.


Asunto(s)
Intervención basada en la Internet , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Colorado , Toma de Decisiones , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo
12.
Health Educ Behav ; 46(3): 454-462, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30596265

RESUMEN

The internet is an important source of vaccine information for parents. We evaluated and compared the interactive content on an expert moderated vaccine social media (VSM) website developed for parents of children 24 months of age or younger and enrolled in a health care system to a random sample of interactions extracted from publicly available parenting and vaccine-focused blogs and discussion forums. The study observation period was September 2013 through July 2016. Three hundred sixty-seven eligible websites were located using search terms related to vaccines. Seventy-nine samples of interactions about vaccines on public blogs and discussion boards and 61 interactions from the expert moderated VSM website were coded for tone, vaccine stance, and accuracy of information. If information was inaccurate, it was coded as corrected, partially corrected or uncorrected. Using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, we compared coded interactions from the VSM website with coded interactions from the sample of publicly available websites. We then identified representative quotes to illustrate the quantitative results. Tone, vaccine stance, and accuracy of information were significantly different (all p < .05). Publicly available vaccine websites tended to be more contentious and have a negative stance toward vaccines. These websites also had inaccurate and uncorrected information. In contrast, the expert moderated website had a more civil tone, minimal posting of inaccurate information, with very little participant-to-participant interaction. An expert moderated, interactive vaccine website appears to provide a platform for parents to gather accurate vaccine information, express their vaccine concerns and ask questions of vaccine experts.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor , Padres/psicología , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Vacunación/psicología , Adulto , Colorado , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino
13.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(3): 908-914, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30201160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of health technology has shown potential to improve asthma adherence and outcomes. Few studies have looked at the implementation of such research within larger asthma populations. OBJECTIVE: This report examines the process of translating results from a pragmatic trial using speech recognition (SR) in children with persistent asthma into the standard operating procedure within a large health maintenance organization. Medication adherence and outcomes in adults with asthma were examined. METHODS: The SR protocol was implemented for the total Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) patient population of 480,142, of whom 36,356 had asthma. Patients had persistent asthma, filled 1 or more inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions in the prior 6 months, and remained continuously enrolled with KPCO for 2 years. Documented exacerbations included the presence of a hospitalization, emergency department visit, or course of oral corticosteroid where asthma was the principal diagnosis. Adherence and exacerbation events were compared 1 year before and 1 year after intervention for 4,510 adults aged 19 to 64. RESULTS: Patient adherence demonstrated a small but significant improvement from 39.5% to 41.7% (P < .0001). Although not significant, data trends suggested greater improvement for patients with lower socioeconomic status. When an outlier month was removed from both the pre- and postintervention time periods, courses of oral corticosteroids decreased. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were infrequent in both time periods and did not decrease over time. CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost SR intervention reminding patients to fill and take their daily controller asthma medication can improve treatment adherence and decrease the need for oral corticosteroids due to asthma exacerbations, but not decrease emergency department visits or hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Software de Reconocimiento del Habla , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Investigación Biomédica , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tecnología , Adulto Joven
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 55(1): 44-54, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773490

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Successful strategies are needed to address parental vaccine hesitancy, a significant public health issue. The study objective was to assess whether an Internet-based platform with vaccine information and interactive social media components improved parents' vaccine-related attitudes. STUDY DESIGN: A three-arm RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in a large Colorado integrated healthcare organization. Parents were enrolled during September 2013 through October 2015 and followed through November 2016; data were analyzed in 2017. Parents, recruited during pregnancy, were given a survey about vaccine-related attitudes at enrollment (i.e., baseline) and when their child was aged 3-5 months and 12-15 months (Timepoints 1 and 2, respectively). Parental vaccine hesitancy was assessed at baseline. INTERVENTION: Study participants were randomized to the following: a study website with vaccine information and social media components (VSM arm); a website with vaccine information only (VI); or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in parental vaccine attitudes over time by baseline degree of vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Among 1,093 study participants, 945 (86.5%) completed all three surveys. Comparing baseline with Timepoint 1 among vaccine-hesitant parents, the VSM and VI arms were associated with significant improvements in attitudes regarding vaccination benefits compared to usual care (VSM mean change 0.23 on a 5-point scale, 95% CI=0.05, 0.40, VI mean change 0.22, 95% CI=0.04, 0.40). Comparing baseline with Timepoint 2 among hesitant parents, the VSM and VI arms were also associated with significant reductions in parental concerns about vaccination risks compared to usual care (VSM mean change -0.37, 95% CI= -0.60, -0.14, VI mean change -0.31, 95% CI= -0.55, -0.07). Self-efficacy around vaccine decision making also improved among vaccine-hesitant parents. No intervention effect was observed among parents not vaccine-hesitant at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Among vaccine-hesitant parents, an Internet-based intervention improved parents' attitudes about vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01873040.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Adulto , Colorado , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Internet , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas/administración & dosificación
15.
Pediatrics ; 140(6)2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29109107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventions to address vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine acceptance are needed. This study sought to determine if a Web-based, social media intervention increases early childhood immunization. METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted in Colorado from September 2013 to July 2016. Participants were pregnant women, randomly assigned (3:2:1) to a Web site with vaccine information and interactive social media components (VSM), a Web site with vaccine information (VI), or usual care (UC). Vaccination was assessed in infants of participants from birth to age 200 days. The primary outcome was days undervaccinated, measured as a continuous and dichotomous variable. RESULTS: Infants of 888 participants were managed for 200 days. By using a nonparametric rank-based analysis, mean ranks for days undervaccinated were significantly lower in the VSM arm versus UC (P = .02) but not statistically different between the VI and UC (P = .08) or between VSM and VI arms (P = .63). The proportions of infants up-to-date at age 200 days were 92.5, 91.3, and 86.6 in the VSM, VI, and UC arms, respectively. Infants in the VSM arm were more likely to be up-to-date than infants in the UC arm (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.47). Up-to-date status was not statistically different between VI and UC arms (OR = 1.62; 95% CI, 0.87-3.00) or between the VSM and VI arms (OR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.70-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Providing Web-based vaccine information with social media applications during pregnancy can positively influence parental vaccine behaviors.


Asunto(s)
Difusión de la Información/métodos , Internet , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas/farmacología , Adolescente , Adulto , Colorado/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Masculino , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación/tendencias , Adulto Joven
17.
Circulation ; 132(21): 1999-2011, 2015 Nov 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26362632

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment for symptomatic peripheral artery disease includes lower extremity bypass surgery (LEB) and peripheral endovascular interventions (PVIs); however, limited comparative effectiveness data exist between the 2 therapies. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of LEB and PVI in patients with symptomatic claudication and critical limb ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a community-based clinical registry at 2 large integrated healthcare delivery systems, we compared 883 patients undergoing PVI and 975 patients undergoing LEB between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011. Rates of target lesion revascularization were greater for PVI than for LEB in patients presenting with claudication (12.3±2.7% and 19.0±3.5% at 1 and 3 years versus 5.2±2.4% and 8.3±3.1%, log-rank P<0.001) and critical limb ischemia (19.1±4.8% and 31.6±6.3% at 1 and 3 years versus 10.8±2.5% and 16.0±3.2%, log-rank P<0.001). However, in comparison with PVI, LEB was associated with increased rates of complications up to 30 days following the procedure (37.1% versus 11.9%, P<0.001). There were no differences in amputation rates between the 2 groups. Findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses by using propensity methods to account for treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, in comparison with LEB, PVI was associated with fewer 30-day procedural complications, higher revascularization rates at 1 and 3 years, and no difference in subsequent amputations.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , California/epidemiología , Colorado/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Claudicación Intermitente/epidemiología , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Isquemia/epidemiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
18.
Am Heart J ; 170(2): 400-8, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26299239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the presence, extent, and severity of obstruction in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE PAD) affect their functional status, quality of life, and treatment, it is not known if these factors are associated with future cardiovascular events. We empirically created an anatomic runoff score (ARS) to approximate the burden of LE PAD and determined its association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with LE PAD and bilateral angiography undergoing revascularization in a community-based clinical study. Primary clinical outcomes of interest were (1) a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke and (2) amputation-free survival. Cox proportional hazards models were created to identify predictors of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We evaluated 908 patients undergoing angiography, and a total of 260 (28.0%) patients reached the composite end point (45 MI, 63 stroke, and 152 death) during the study period. Anatomic runoff score ranged from 0 to 15 (mean 4.7; SD 2.5) with higher scores indicating a higher burden of disease, and an optimal cutpoint analysis classified patients into low ARS (<5) and high ARS (≥5). The unadjusted rates of the primary composite end point and amputation-free survival were nearly 2-fold higher in patients with a high ARS when compared with patients with a low ARS. The most significant predictors of the composite end point (death/MI/stroke) were age (δ 10 years; hazard ratio [HR] 1.53; CI 1.32-1.78; P < .001), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.65; CI 1.26-2.18; P < .001), glomerular filtration rate <30 (HR 2.23; CI 1.44-3.44; P < .001), statin use (HR 0.66; CI 0.48-0.88; P < .001), and ARS (δ 2 points; HR 1.21; CI 1.08-1.35; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for clinical factors, the LE PAD ARS was an independent predictor of future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a broadly representative patient population undergoing revascularization for symptomatic PAD. A clinically useful anatomic scoring system, if validated, may assist clinicians in risk stratification during the course of clinical decision making.


Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Health Educ Behav ; 42(3): 302-12, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25413375

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe a process for designing, building, and evaluating a theory-driven social media intervention tool to help reduce parental concerns about vaccination. METHOD: We developed an interactive web-based tool using quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g., survey, focus groups, individual interviews, and usability testing). RESULTS: Survey results suggested that social media may represent an effective intervention tool to help parents make informed decisions about vaccination for their children. Focus groups and interviews revealed four main themes for development of the tool: Parents wanted information describing both benefits and risks of vaccination, transparency of sources of information, moderation of the tool by an expert, and ethnic and racial diversity in the visual display of people. Usability testing showed that parents were satisfied with the usability of the tool but had difficulty with performing some of the informational searches. Based on focus groups, interviews, and usability evaluations, we made additional revisions to the tool's content, design, functionality, and overall look and feel. CONCLUSION: Engaging parents at all stages of development is critical when designing a tool to address concerns about childhood vaccines. Although this can be both resource- and time-intensive, the redesigned tool is more likely to be accepted and used by parents. Next steps involve a formal evaluation through a randomized trial.


Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Padres/educación , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Vacunas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Desarrollo de Programa , Interfaz Usuario-Computador
20.
Res Soc Stratif Mobil ; 35: 71-88, 2014 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25767330

RESUMEN

We examine whether grandparents' and parents' ages at birth are associated with grandchildren's early cognitive achievement, and whether grandparents' or parents' socioeconomic status, health, and marital status mediate those associations. Our analysis is based on data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its Child Development Supplement. A grandparent's age at the birth of their own children is robustly and positively associated with grandchildren's verbal achievement, but not with grandchildren's applied mathematics achievement, after controlling for parents' age at the grandchild's birth. The associations are similar in magnitude for grandmothers and grandfathers. A variety of indicators of social class in the grandparent and parent generations did not mediate this age effect. However, many of those indicators of grandparents' social class were directly or indirectly related to grandchildren's achievement.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...